Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 7762 [post_author] => 103 [post_date] => 2024-12-20 15:45:18 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:45:18 [post_content] => On 13th November 2024, the Foreign Policy Centre (FPC), in collaboration with the Department of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham (POLSIS) and the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Women, Peace and Security (APPG-WPS) convened a parliamentary roundtable to discuss how to negotiate, design and implement effective peace processes and how the UK can promote inclusive peace processes abroad.   The discussion was chaired by Baroness Fiona Hodgson, Chair of the APPG-WPS and was led by a panel of experts who shared their insights from academic research, policy, parliament and practice. Speakers were: Dr Giuditta Fontana, Associate Professor in International Security at the University of Birmingham, Dr Fatiha Serour, Co-founder of Justice Impact Lab and Chair of the Africa Group of Justice & Accountability (AGJA); Eva Tabbasam, Director of Gender Action for Peace and Security UK (GAPS-UK); and Fabian Hamilton, Member of Parliament for Leeds North East. Alice Copland, FPC’s Policy and Parliamentary Affairs Manager, also provided her insights.   The discussion was prompted by a recently concluded research project led by the University of Birmingham - ‘Learning from Failure: How to Prevent Civil War Recurrence’, which was funded by the United States Institute for Peace (USIP). Previous research has found that 40% of civil wars and conflict relapse into large-scale violence after the signing of a Peace Accord. Furthermore, 90% of conflicts in the first decade of the 21st century occurred in countries that had previously experienced conflict.   Research, evidence and experience has shown that peace processes are more likely to be stable and resilient when women are included in peace negotiations, and when peace agreements map socio-economic measures to include women in post-conflict society. Despite this, there has been a backsliding of women’s rights and the inclusion of women in peace negotiations remains low. The panel shared their insights from academic research, policy and practice to discuss what makes a peace process successful in ending violent conflict; the role of inclusion, particularly of women, in creating sustainable peace; and how the UK Government can, through its Foreign and Development policies, support the promotion of sustainable, inclusive peace processes globally.   Four key takeaways emerged from the roundtable discussion

1. The characteristics of peace settlements matter for preventing the recurrence of civil war;
2. The inclusion of women and civil society organisations at all stages of a peace process is essential for sustainable peace;
3. Key lessons for embedding the inclusion of women in peace negotiations and peace processes can be identified;
4. Distinct challenges to the inclusion of women in peace processes remain.

  As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, penholder for the Women, Peace and Security Agenda (WPS) at the UN, and with a strong WPS National Action Plan (NAP), the UK is in a strong position to support peace agreements that will end conflict and to influence positive change toward the inclusion of women in peace processes. The UK Government should use its influence to ‘lead by example’ as a donor, diplomat and advocate for the WPS agenda, with inclusion as a core principle of a new Foreign and Development policy. Monitoring, adaptation, reform and resources are essential in the long term for conflict transitions, therefore the UK should carefully select in which contexts it will involve itself and be prepared for long-term commitment.     Download the full summary of the expert briefing here.       Baroness Hodgson: “Accountability for implementation [is important] because too often it's words and rhetoric, but it's not actions, and it doesn't translate out there on the ground"   Dr Giuditta Fontana: “The UK is in fact in a very strong position to make a difference… to individual peace processes, but also to the way in which war to peace transitions are conceived of on a broader global scale.”   Dr Fatiha Serour: “A peace process is there to basically use the logic of confrontation and transform it into one of collaboration. Because when there is conflict, it's basically not that we are divided, but we have issues to deal with, and a peace process should help us to sit down, look at what unites rather than divides us.”   Fabian Hamilton MP: “Peace is a process. It's not a one-off event… It takes time, energy, and commitment. One of the biggest drivers of conflict is inequality…so a more equal world will help considerably in preventing or halting future conflicts.”   Eva Tabbasam: “We should seize the moment leading up to the 25th anniversary to champion the inclusion of women, marginalized groups, civil society in peace building, to ensure that peace is not just negotiated but also owned and sustained by the people it serves. Together we build a future where peace is not just the absence of conflict, but is the presence of justice, equality and opportunity.”   Alice Copland:“Inclusion is difficult, or is often failing, because it challenges the status quo. It can be difficult and it takes time, and you cannot expect results quickly. We need tireless, brave, accountable, and committed leadership to support and resource grassroots organisations in genuine partnership, so when things become challenging, we can keep going.”     [post_title] => Expert Briefing: ‘Promoting Inclusive Peace’ Key Takeaways from a Parliamentary Roundtable Discussion [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => expert-briefing-promoting-inclusive-peace-key-takeaways [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 16:24:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 15:24:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://fpc.org.uk/?p=7762 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 7426 [post_author] => 103 [post_date] => 2024-05-09 16:24:12 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-09 15:24:12 [post_content] => In March 2024, the Foreign Policy Centre (FPC), together with the APPG on Ukraine, and with support from the University of Birmingham, convened an off-the-record roundtable meeting in Parliament to discuss the ongoing situation on the ground in Ukraine and, as Russia’s war entered its third year, priorities for ongoing international support.   The discussion was chaired by Susan Coughtrie, Director of the Foreign Policy Centre. The conversation was led by a panel of experts who shared their unique insights. These included: David H Dunn, Professor of International Politics at the University of Birmingham; Rachael Cox, Head of Policy at the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (who updated on the humanitarian situation only); Elly Nott, CEO and Co-Founder of the David Nott Foundation; Tanya Mulesa, Director at Justice & Accountability for Ukraine (JAFUA); Tom Keatinge, founding Director of the Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies (CFCS) at RUSI; and Olga Tokariuk, Chatham House OSUN Academy Fellow in the Ukraine Forum.   The panel discussed Ukraine’s ongoing humanitarian, political and military needs. Experts also reflected on the impact of the international community’s response to Russia’s full-scale invasion and explored how this could shift in the future, particularly with US elections looming and engagement with the Global South still often overlooked. The panellists examined future prospects for the conflict, for the long-term reconstruction of Ukraine and legal accountability for Russia.   The international community, including the United Kingdom, has underlined its commitment to supporting Ukraine for ‘as long as it takes’. Participating experts shared that this thinking should shift to guaranteeing support for Ukraine for as ‘short as it takes’, emphasising a commitment to supporting Ukraine to win the war as quickly as possible, rather than simply to survive. Parliamentarians and staffers were able to hear these insights directly and engage in discussion on how the UK could shape its future approach.   Key takeaways emerged from the conversation and are summarised in the following sections below:

1. Humanitarian need in Ukraine remains critical;
2. The future response of the international community is unclear, but will have implications for Ukraine and globally;
3. Countries must invest in Ukraine to protect its and their own security and interests, however ongoing support is not guaranteed;
4. As the war continues the long-term challenges of conflict are coming into closer view; and
5. Developing a shared mechanism for holding Russia legally and financially accountable for its illegal invasion of Ukraine is crucial.

  Download the full summary of the briefing here. [post_title] => Expert Briefing: Priorities for international support to Ukraine, as Russia’s war rages into its third year [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => expert-briefing-priorities-for-international-support-to-ukraine-as-russias-war-rages-into-its-third-year [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-05-16 14:48:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-05-16 13:48:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://fpc.org.uk/?p=7426 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) )